(Screenshot)

After pitching orbital data centers, Musk went further: a lunar city, launching AI satellites into deep space via maglev. This isn’t a whim—it echoes SpaceX’s Mars narrative, now fading in favor of the Kardashev Scale: harnessing a star’s energy to train intelligence beyond imagination.

The catch? No one paid for Mars. Starship’s mission has shrunk from colonization to Starlink launches and NASA lunar contracts. The Moon base, too, is far from reality. But it was never a business plan—it’s a recruitment pitch. As one departing xAI exec put it: “Every AI lab is building the same thing. It’s boring.”

A solar-system-scale supercomputer on the Moon? Call it what you want. But it’s not boring.

Roger Luo said:As AI labs converge on sameness, Musk deploys space colonization as both talent magnet and strategic rhetoric. Vision becomes differentiation.

All articles and pictures are from the Internet. If there are any copyright issues, please contact us in time to delete.

Inquiry us [contact-form-7]

(Musk photo)

The new structure splits xAI into four teams: Grok chatbot, coding system, Imagine video generator, and Macrohard. Imagine now generates 50 million videos daily and over 6 billion images monthly—but those figures overlap with a surge in deepfake porn on X, including an estimated 1.8 million sexualized images in just nine days.

Musk doubled down on space-based data centers, envisioning a lunar factory with an electromagnetic mass driver to launch AI satellites. Such infrastructure, he said, could eventually support AI clusters capable of harnessing solar energy or expanding to other galaxies. “It’s hard to imagine what intelligence at that scale would think about,” Musk said, “but it’ll be incredibly exciting to see it happen.”

Toby Pohlen, head of Macrohard, added: “Anything a computer can do, Macrohard can do. Soon, rocket engines will be fully designed by AI.”

Roger Luo said:Grand visions of intergalactic intelligence collide with platform-wide deepfake chaos. xAI’s technical ambition is unmistakable, but so is its ethical blind spot. A moon base may be decades away—moderating explicit content is not.

All articles and pictures are from the Internet. If there are any copyright issues, please contact us in time to delete.

Inquiry us [contact-form-7]

(Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg / Getty Images)

XAI launched Grokipedia in October last year, after Musk repeatedly criticized Wikipedia for bias against conservatives. The media then found that although many entries seemed to be copied directly from Wikipedia, Grokimedia also claimed that pornographic content aggravated the AIDS crisis, provided an “ideological defense” for slavery, and used derogatory expressions against cross gender groups.

For an encyclopedia derived from a chatbot that once claimed to be a “mechanical Hitler” and was used to spread deepfake pornographic content on the X platform, these contents may not be surprising. However, its information seems to be gradually spreading beyond Musk’s ecosystem – The Guardian reported that GPT-5.2 cited content from Grokipedia nine times in response to over ten different questions.

The Guardian pointed out that ChatGPT did not cite the source when asked about topics on which the false information of Grokimedia has been widely reported, such as the riots on Capitol Hill on January 6 or the AIDS epidemic. On the contrary, citations appear on more obscure topics, including statements about historian Richard Evans that The Guardian has previously clarified. Anthropic’s Claude model also referenced Grokipedia when answering certain questions. ）

A spokesperson for OpenAI told The Guardian that the company is committed to obtaining information from a wide range of publicly available sources and diverse perspectives.

Roger Luo said:This incident exposes a critical flaw in generative AI’s cross-system information integration: the absence of an effective fact-prioritization mechanism and a traceability verification framework. When algorithms indiscriminately absorb ideologically biased data sources, they not only distort the neutrality of knowledge dissemination but also risk systematically polluting the foundation of public understanding.

All articles and pictures are from the Internet. If there are any copyright issues, please contact us in time to delete.

Inquiry us [contact-form-7]

(Elon Musk Hosts Weekly Twitter Q&A)

These weekly Q&A events start immediately. Musk intends to cover many topics. He will discuss Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and The Boring Company. Broader subjects like technology and the future are also on the table. X users can submit questions in real time. Musk will pick which ones to answer live. This offers unprecedented access to the entrepreneur.

“The goal is simple,” Musk stated. “Talk directly with people. Share updates. Answer things openly. No filters.” He stressed the importance of real-time conversation. This approach bypasses traditional media channels. It connects Musk straight to the public.

The first session is scheduled for this Friday. Specific timing details will follow. Musk advised users to monitor his official X account. Notifications about exact start times will appear there. Participation requires an active X account. Users simply need to post questions using a designated hashtag during the event. Musk will read questions directly from the platform feed. His answers will be immediate and unscripted.

(Elon Musk Hosts Weekly Twitter Q&A)

This move signals Musk’s ongoing commitment to X. He purchased the platform last year. Frequent interaction with users has been a priority since then. Weekly Q&As represent a significant escalation of this effort. Industry observers note the potential impact. Direct communication builds stronger community ties. It allows Musk to control his message completely. Reactions on X were mixed. Some users welcomed the open access. Others questioned the practicality of managing such large-scale interactions weekly. Musk remains confident. He believes the format will work.

(Elon Musk’s Management Style at Twitter)

Changes to the platform itself came rapidly. Musk altered core features significantly. He overhauled the account verification system. The traditional blue checkmark became a paid subscription perk. This change caused widespread confusion. It also led to impersonation problems. Musk defended it as a vital money-making feature. He pushed other money-making features aggressively too. Advertising revenue initially dropped sharply. Major brands paused spending. Musk blamed activist groups for this pressure. He actively courted advertisers back personally. Revenue trends reportedly improved later.

Musk strongly emphasizes his commitment to free speech. He reinstated numerous previously banned accounts. This included several controversial figures. Content moderation policies underwent major revisions. Critics argue this allowed more harmful speech. Musk insists the platform is now fairer. He frames it as a digital town square. This vision deeply divided opinions. Technical issues sometimes plagued the site. Outages occurred. Users reported unusual glitches. Musk often attributed these to necessary backend changes.

(Elon Musk’s Management Style at Twitter)

The company name changed to X. Musk has ambitious plans to transform it into an “everything app”. He envisions integrating payments and comprehensive financial services. This goal requires significant technical development. The platform faces ongoing challenges. Competition remains intense. Regulatory scrutiny is increasing globally. Musk’s direct management style defines the company’s current path. His decisions continue to shape the platform’s daily operations and future direction.